[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6cf66002-f13d-a1ee-7fa6-dfa78d6be427@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 18:07:11 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "mlxsw: core: Add the hottest thermal zone
detection"
Hi Vadim,
On 04/08/2022 14:21, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>> Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 12:56 PM
>> To: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org; rafael@...nel.org
>> Cc: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com>; davem@...emloft.net;
>> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Ido Schimmel
>> <idosch@...dia.com>; Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>; Eric Dumazet
>> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni
>> <pabeni@...hat.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "mlxsw: core: Add the hottest thermal zone
>> detection"
>>
>> This reverts commit 6f73862fabd93213de157d9cc6ef76084311c628.
>>
>> As discussed in the thread:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/f3c62ebe-7d59-c537-a010-
>> bff366c8aeba@...aro.org/
>>
>> the feature provided by commits 2dc2f760052da and 6f73862fabd93 is
>> actually already handled by the thermal framework via the cooling device
>> state aggregation, thus all this code is pointless.
>>
>> The revert conflicts with the following changes:
>> - 7f4957be0d5b8: thermal: Use mode helpers in drivers
>> - 6a79507cfe94c: mlxsw: core: Extend thermal module with per QSFP module
>> thermal zones
>>
>> These conflicts were fixed and the resulting changes are in this patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Tested-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com>
Thanks for testing
> Daniel,
> Could you, please, re-base the patch on top of net-next as Jakub mentioned?
> Or do you want me to do it?
It is fine, I can do it. The conflict is trivial.
However, I would have preferred to have the patch in my tree so I can
continue the consolidation work.
Is it ok if I pick the patch and the conflict being simple, that can be
handle at merge time, no?
> There is also redundant blank line in this patch:
> &mlxsw_thermal_module_ops,
> +
> &mlxsw_thermal_params,
Yeah, thanks.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists