[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2f6c89b-a96d-ba13-5e85-c1a84eaec678@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 18:37:21 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] thermal/core: Rearm the monitoring only one time
Hi Rafael,
On 05/08/2022 18:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 5:38 PM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> The current code calls monitor_thermal_zone() inside the
>> handle_thermal_trip() function. But this one is called in a loop for
>> each trip point which means the monitoring is rearmed several times
>> for nothing (assuming there could be several passive and active trip
>> points).
>>
>> Move the monitor_thermal_zone() function out of the
>> handle_thermal_trip() function and after the thermal trip loop, so the
>> timer will be disabled or rearmed one time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>
> Does this series depend on any other? >
> You've been sending quite a lot of material lately and it is not
> always easy to tell what the dependencies between the different patch
> series are.
Yes I understand.
This series does not depend on any other. It is not related to any
pending changes.
It may have trivial conflicts with the other 26 patches series but it
would be the case for any submissions posted by someone else anyway.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists