linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 01/27] kallsyms: use `sizeof` instead of hardcoded size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Aug 2022 20:46:22 +0200
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Geert Stappers <stappers@...ppers.nl>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/27] kallsyms: use `sizeof` instead of hardcoded size

On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 6:48 PM Geert Stappers <stappers@...ppers.nl> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Stappers <stappers@...ppers.nl>

Thanks for the message and the support, but please note that since you
are not in the path of the patch, you cannot use this tag; instead
look into Reviewed-by etc. See
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.19/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by
and the following section for details.

> And I think that this patch and all other "rust" kallsyms patches
> allready should have been accepted in the v3 or v5 series.

Yeah, it could be a good idea to get the prerequisites in first. Let's
see if the patches get some Reviewed-bys (e.g. I had to remove Kees'
one because I had to split the patch).

Cheers,
Miguel