[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <70BEF411-33A1-4733-AE09-BE8486D2F8E8@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 20:28:19 +0000
From: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>
To: "alexlzhu@...com" <alexlzhu@...com>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"kernel-team@...com" <kernel-team@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: add thp_utilization metrics to
/proc/thp_utilization
> On Aug 5, 2022, at 12:40, alexlzhu@...com wrote:
>
> From: Alexander Zhu <alexlzhu@...com>
>
> This change introduces a tool that scans through all of physical
> memory for anonymous THPs and groups them into buckets based
> on utilization.
Out of curiosity, do you have any statistics on how much of a performance impact scanning may have?
We've reached the point where we've finally been able to show previous admonitions to not enable THP due to a negative performance impact no longer hold true, and I'd hate to see systems on which enabling THP now would cause a performance hit due to this scanner.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists