[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <aaeba9c12ccdb29f48fe19137cb5abeea85fbb24.1659732652.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 22:55:30 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf/arm_pmu_platform: Fix an error message related to dev_err_probe() usage
dev_err() is a macro that expand dev_fmt, but dev_err_probe() is a
function and cannot perform this macro expansion.
So hard code the "hw perfevents: " prefix and dd a comment explaining why.
Fixes: 11fa1dc8020a ("perf/arm_pmu_platform: Use dev_err_probe() for IRQ errors")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
---
Untested, but I can't see how it could work.
v1 --> v2
- fix a typo in the comment
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
index 513de1f54e2d..02cca4b8f0fd 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
@@ -101,8 +101,11 @@ static int pmu_parse_irqs(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
num_irqs = platform_irq_count(pdev);
- if (num_irqs < 0)
- return dev_err_probe(dev, num_irqs, "unable to count PMU IRQs\n");
+ if (num_irqs < 0) {
+ /* dev_err_probe() does not handle dev_fmt, so hard-code the prefix */
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, num_irqs,
+ "hw perfevents: unable to count PMU IRQs\n");
+ }
/*
* In this case we have no idea which CPUs are covered by the PMU.
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists