[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yu7DNaeknjO9g9m9@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2022 21:38:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Hao Jia <jiahao.os@...edance.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched/psi: psi bug fixes and cleanups
* Hao Jia <jiahao.os@...edance.com> wrote:
> These three patches are about PSI.
> patch 1: Fixed PSI statistics error caused by unzeroed memory
> in struct psi_group.
> patch 2 and patch 3 are to clean up some unused functions
> and parameters.
>
> Hao Jia (3):
> sched/psi: Zero the memory of struct psi_group
> sched/psi: Remove unused parameter nbytes of psi_trigger_create()
> sched/psi: Remove redundant cgroup_psi() when !CONFIG_CGROUPS
>
> include/linux/cgroup.h | 5 -----
> include/linux/psi.h | 2 +-
> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/psi.c | 10 +++-------
> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
LGTM, and I suspect the scheduler fix wants to go upstream via the tree
that introduced the bug, the cgroup tree?
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists