[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2b65bf8d2b4d940cafbafcede07c23c35f042f5a.1659815764.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2022 21:56:13 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....nxp.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] vfio/fsl-mc: Fix a typo in a comment
L and S are swapped/
s/VFIO_FLS_MC/VFIO_FSL_MC/
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
---
All the dev_ logging functions in the file have the "VFIO_FSL_MC: "
prefix.
As they are dev_ function, the driver should already be displayed.
So, does it make sense or could they be all removed?
---
drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
index 3feff729f3ce..66d01db1d240 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static void vfio_fsl_mc_close_device(struct vfio_device *core_vdev)
if (WARN_ON(ret))
dev_warn(&mc_cont->dev,
- "VFIO_FLS_MC: reset device has failed (%d)\n", ret);
+ "VFIO_FSL_MC: reset device has failed (%d)\n", ret);
vfio_fsl_mc_irqs_cleanup(vdev);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists