linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/8] remoteproc: qcom: Add compatible name for SC7280 ADSP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6327ba5b-f3a9-7390-0456-67ba5ffde0b6@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 6 Aug 2022 23:57:00 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        broonie@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, quic_plai@...cinc.com,
        bgoswami@...cinc.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
        srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        swboyd@...omium.org, judyhsiao@...omium.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] remoteproc: qcom: Add compatible name for SC7280 ADSP

On 03/08/2022 17:21, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
> Update adsp pil data and compatible name for loading ADSP
> binary on SC7280 based platforms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>
> ---
>   drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
> index 2f3b9f5..bb4494c 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
> @@ -697,6 +697,24 @@ static const struct adsp_pil_data adsp_resource_init = {
>   	},
>   };
>   
> +static const struct adsp_pil_data adsp_sc7280_resource_init = {
> +	.crash_reason_smem = 423,
> +	.firmware_name = "adsp.mbn",
> +	.load_state = "adsp",
> +	.ssr_name = "lpass",
> +	.sysmon_name = "adsp",
> +	.ssctl_id = 0x14,
> +	.is_wpss = false,
> +	.auto_boot = true,
> +	.clk_ids = (const char*[]) {
> +		"gcc_cfg_noc_lpass", NULL

The clock is not mentioned in dt bindings.

> +	},
> +	.num_clks = 1,
> +	.proxy_pd_names = (const char*[]) {
> +		NULL
> +	},

Is the empty array necessary?

> +};
> +
>   static const struct adsp_pil_data cdsp_resource_init = {
>   	.crash_reason_smem = 601,
>   	.firmware_name = "cdsp.mdt",
> @@ -737,6 +755,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id adsp_of_match[] = {
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-cdsp-pil", .data = &cdsp_resource_init },
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-wpss-pil", .data = &wpss_resource_init },
>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-adsp-pil", .data = &adsp_resource_init },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-adsp-pil", .data = &adsp_sc7280_resource_init },
>   	{ },
>   };
>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, adsp_of_match);


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry