[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220806212331.40086-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2022 00:23:29 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/4] pwm: sysfs: Return directly from the for-loop in PM callbacks
There is no need to assign ret to 0 and then break the loop just
for returning the error to the caller. Instead, return directly
from the for-loop, and 0 otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
index c21b6046067b..1543fe07765b 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static int pwm_class_resume_npwm(struct device *parent, unsigned int npwm)
{
struct pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(parent);
unsigned int i;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
for (i = 0; i < npwm; i++) {
struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->pwms[i];
@@ -427,17 +427,17 @@ static int pwm_class_resume_npwm(struct device *parent, unsigned int npwm)
state.enabled = export->suspend.enabled;
ret = pwm_class_apply_state(export, pwm, &state);
if (ret < 0)
- break;
+ return ret;
}
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int pwm_class_suspend(struct device *parent)
{
struct pwm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(parent);
unsigned int i;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
for (i = 0; i < chip->npwm; i++) {
struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->pwms[i];
@@ -457,11 +457,11 @@ static int pwm_class_suspend(struct device *parent)
* this suspend function.
*/
pwm_class_resume_npwm(parent, i);
- break;
+ return ret;
}
}
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int pwm_class_resume(struct device *parent)
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists