linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm/ioremap: change the return value of io[re|un]map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220807014206.GA416711@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date:   Sun, 7 Aug 2022 09:42:06 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm/ioremap: change the return value of
 io[re|un]map_allowed

On 08/06/22 at 10:29am, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > 
> > On 2022/8/4 23:42, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 10:40:19PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Baoquan,
> > > 
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c
> > > > @@ -3,19 +3,20 @@
> > > >   #include <linux/mm.h>
> > > >   #include <linux/io.h>
> > > > -bool ioremap_allowed(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size, unsigned long prot)
> > > > +void __iomem *ioremap_allowed(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size, unsigned long prot)
> > > >   {
> > > >   	unsigned long last_addr = phys_addr + size - 1;
> > > > +	int ret = -EINVAL;
> > > If ret variable is really needed?
> > > 
> > > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> > > > index 72974cb81343..d72eb310fb3c 100644
> > > > --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h
> > > > +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> > > > @@ -967,26 +967,27 @@ static inline void iounmap(volatile void __iomem *addr)
> > > >   /*
> > > >    * Arch code can implement the following two hooks when using GENERIC_IOREMAP
> > > >    * ioremap_allowed() return a bool,
> > > > - *   - true means continue to remap
> > > > - *   - false means skip remap and return directly
> > > > + *   - IS_ERR means return an error
> > > > + *   - NULL means continue to remap
> > > > + *   - a non-NULL, non-IS_ERR pointer is returned directly
> > > If ioremap_allowed() returns a valid pointer, then the function name
> > > is not as precise anymore.
> > 
> > Maybe use arch_ioremap/unmap as before, or some better name.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > @@ -28,8 +29,11 @@ void __iomem *ioremap_prot(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> > > >   	phys_addr -= offset;
> > > >   	size = PAGE_ALIGN(size + offset);
> > > > -	if (!ioremap_allowed(phys_addr, size, prot))
> > > > +	base = ioremap_allowed(phys_addr, size, prot);
> > > > +	if (IS_ERR(base))
> > > >   		return NULL;
> > > > +	else if (base)
> > > > +		return base;
> > > It is probably just me, but the base name bit misleading here.
> > We could reuse vaddr, not add new base.
> 
> vaddr name is wrong AFAICT. ioremap_allowed() returns __iomem address,
> not the virtual one.

Thanks a lot for reviewing, both.

Here, I tend to agree with Alexander. ioremap_allowed() returns
__iomem*. How about naming it io_addr here. While I don't have strong
opinion about it, reusing vaddr and casting it to (__iomem*) when return
is also OK to me.

> 
> > > 
> > > > @@ -50,9 +54,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ioremap_prot);
> > > >   void iounmap(volatile void __iomem *addr)
> > > >   {
> > > > -	void *vaddr = (void *)((unsigned long)addr & PAGE_MASK);
> > > > +	void __iomem *vaddr = (void __iomem *)((unsigned long)addr & PAGE_MASK);
> 
> Same here.


> 
> > > > -	if (!iounmap_allowed(vaddr))
> > > > +	if (iounmap_allowed(vaddr))
> > > I guess, iounmap_allowed() should accept void __iomem *, not void *.
> > > Then addr needs to be passed to iounmap_allowed() not vaddr.
> > 
> > The following is_vmalloc_addr()  and vunmap() in iounmap() use void *,
> > 
> > so we could simply use void* for iounmap_allowed().
> 
> iounmap_allowed() accepts void __iomem * and I that looks correct to me.
> 
> Passing void * on the other hand means you pass a pointer that
> in theory differs from what architecture previously returned
> with ioremap_allowed() and "knows" nothing about.
> 
> I think you need to pass addr to iounmap_allowed() as is.

OK, I will change to pass (__iomem*) to iounmap_allowed() directly.
Thanks.