lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdYrnb8k72TFhB9eKDtyj_pm1gDqL+sDYixkuYy0Xb_Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 7 Aug 2022 11:20:03 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] hwmon: (pwm-fan) Make use of device properties

On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 10:38 AM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:

> at a quick glance this looks nice. I wonder if it makes sense to split
> the patch. For example the change
>
> -       ctx->pwm = devm_of_pwm_get(dev, dev->of_node, NULL);
> +       ctx->pwm = devm_pwm_get(dev, NULL);
>
> could stand alone. Also I think this change is the relevant part in
> patch #1 that makes patches #2 and #3 possible.

True.

> When this patch doesn't get split, the series needs some coordination,
> as patch #1 is for hwmon and patches #2 and #3 are for pwm.
>
> Splitting the series into:
>
>         hwmon: (pwm-fan) Use of devm_pwm_get() instead of devm_of_pwm_get()
>         pwm: core: Get rid of unused devm_of_pwm_get()
>         pwm: core: Make of_pwm_get() static
>
> for pwm and the remainder of this patch for hwmon might make application
> of the changes here easier to coordinate.

Either way it will need the hwmon maintainer ACKs or alike.
Since we have (plenty of) time I will wait a bit for hwmon maintainers
to react. Guenter, what would you prefer?

> But still: Thanks for your effort and
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>

Thanks for looking into the series related to PWM core clean up!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ