linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/gem: Fix GEM handle release errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 8 Aug 2022 20:05:04 +0200
From:   Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To:     Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
        Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/gem: Fix GEM handle release errors



Am 02.08.22 um 13:33 schrieb Jeffy Chen:
> Currently we are assuming a one to one mapping between dmabuf and handle
> when releasing GEM handles.
>
> But that is not always true, since we would create extra handles for the
> GEM obj in cases like gem_open() and getfb{,2}().
>
> A similar issue was reported at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211105083308.392156-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com/
>
> Another problem is that the drm_gem_remove_prime_handles() now only
> remove handle to the exported dmabuf (gem_obj->dma_buf), so the imported
> ones would leak:
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 236 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c:228 drm_prime_destroy_file_private+0x18/0x24
>
> Let's fix these by using handle to find the exact map to remove.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
> ---
>
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c      | 17 +----------------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h |  4 ++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c    | 16 ++++++++++------
>   3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index eb0c2d041f13..ed39da383570 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -168,21 +168,6 @@ void drm_gem_private_object_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_private_object_init);
>   
> -static void
> -drm_gem_remove_prime_handles(struct drm_gem_object *obj, struct drm_file *filp)
> -{
> -	/*
> -	 * Note: obj->dma_buf can't disappear as long as we still hold a
> -	 * handle reference in obj->handle_count.
> -	 */
> -	mutex_lock(&filp->prime.lock);
> -	if (obj->dma_buf) {
> -		drm_prime_remove_buf_handle_locked(&filp->prime,
> -						   obj->dma_buf);
> -	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&filp->prime.lock);
> -}
> -
>   /**
>    * drm_gem_object_handle_free - release resources bound to userspace handles
>    * @obj: GEM object to clean up.
> @@ -253,7 +238,7 @@ drm_gem_object_release_handle(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
>   	if (obj->funcs->close)
>   		obj->funcs->close(obj, file_priv);
>   
> -	drm_gem_remove_prime_handles(obj, file_priv);
> +	drm_prime_remove_buf_handle(&file_priv->prime, id);
>   	drm_vma_node_revoke(&obj->vma_node, file_priv);
>   
>   	drm_gem_object_handle_put_unlocked(obj);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> index 1fbbc19f1ac0..7bb98e6a446d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> @@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ int drm_prime_fd_to_handle_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   
>   void drm_prime_init_file_private(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv);
>   void drm_prime_destroy_file_private(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv);
> -void drm_prime_remove_buf_handle_locked(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv,
> -					struct dma_buf *dma_buf);
> +void drm_prime_remove_buf_handle(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv,
> +				 uint32_t handle);
>   
>   /* drm_drv.c */
>   struct drm_minor *drm_minor_acquire(unsigned int minor_id);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> index e3f09f18110c..c28518ab62d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> @@ -190,29 +190,33 @@ static int drm_prime_lookup_buf_handle(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpri
>   	return -ENOENT;
>   }
>   
> -void drm_prime_remove_buf_handle_locked(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv,
> -					struct dma_buf *dma_buf)
> +void drm_prime_remove_buf_handle(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv,
> +				 uint32_t handle)
>   {
>   	struct rb_node *rb;
>   
> +	mutex_lock(&prime_fpriv->lock);
> +
>   	rb = prime_fpriv->dmabufs.rb_node;
>   	while (rb) {
>   		struct drm_prime_member *member;
>   
>   		member = rb_entry(rb, struct drm_prime_member, dmabuf_rb);
> -		if (member->dma_buf == dma_buf) {
> +		if (member->handle == handle) {
>   			rb_erase(&member->handle_rb, &prime_fpriv->handles);
>   			rb_erase(&member->dmabuf_rb, &prime_fpriv->dmabufs);
>   
> -			dma_buf_put(dma_buf);
> +			dma_buf_put(member->dma_buf);
>   			kfree(member);
> -			return;
> -		} else if (member->dma_buf < dma_buf) {
> +			break;
> +		} else if (member->handle < handle) {

Just to make it clear once more. That change here is completely broken.

The rb is indexed by the dma_buf object, not the handle.

Regards,
Christian.

>   			rb = rb->rb_right;
>   		} else {
>   			rb = rb->rb_left;
>   		}
>   	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&prime_fpriv->lock);
>   }
>   
>   void drm_prime_init_file_private(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv)