[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:42:03 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 27/32] PCI/P2PDMA: Convert to printbuf
On 8/8/22 13:51, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I don't object to the patch, but it would be nice if the commit log
> hinted at what the advantage is. I assume it's faster/safer/better in
> some way, but I have no idea what.
Printbufs have some additional features over seq_buf but they're not
used here. The main one you might be interested in is heap allocation:
that means no need to statically allocate buffers on the stack and no
need to calculate the buffer size, printbufs will reallocate as necessary.
I generally haven't been converting code to use that unless it's obvious
that we're in a context where it's safe to allocate memory and can deal
with allocation failures.
I notice that in calc_map_type_and_dist() you're using xa_store() which
can fail, but you're not checking for that or returning errors properly
:) perhaps a fix for that could also switch to using printbuf in
heap-allocation mode.
> Also, cpu_show_meltdown() doesn't appear in this patch, so maybe
> that's relevant to some other patch but not this one?
Whoops, was copying the commit message from another patch, yeah.n
Powered by blists - more mailing lists