[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <575181dc6cdd1fcf391e840c0fcd5722b954a457.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 16:04:01 +0800
From: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>, <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <daniel@...ll.ch>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
<tzimmermann@...e.de>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <deller@....de>,
<airlied@...ux.ie>
CC: <msp@...libre.com>, <granquet@...libre.com>,
<jitao.shi@...iatek.com>, <wenst@...omium.org>,
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
<liangxu.xu@...iatek.com>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 3/8] drm/mediatek: Add MT8195 Embedded DisplayPort
driver
Hi, Bo-Chen:
On Fri, 2022-08-05 at 18:14 +0800, Bo-Chen Chen wrote:
> From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
>
> This patch adds a embedded displayport driver for the MediaTek mt8195
> SoC.
>
> It supports the MT8195, the embedded DisplayPort units. It offers
> DisplayPort 1.4 with up to 4 lanes.
>
> The driver creates a child device for the phy. The child device will
> never exist without the parent being active. As they are sharing a
> register range, the parent passes a regmap pointer to the child so
> that
> both can work with the same register range. The phy driver sets
> device
> data that is read by the parent to get the phy device that can be
> used
> to control the phy properties.
>
> This driver is based on an initial version by
> Jitao shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
> Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +
> +static enum drm_mode_status
> +mtk_dp_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> + const struct drm_display_info *info,
> + const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> +{
> + struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp = mtk_dp_from_bridge(bridge);
> + u32 rx_linkrate = (u32)mtk_dp->train_info.link_rate * 27000;
> + u32 bpp = info->color_formats & DRM_COLOR_FORMAT_YCBCR422 ? 16
> : 24;
> +
> + if (rx_linkrate * mtk_dp->train_info.lane_count < mode->clock *
> bpp / 8)
> + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> +
> + if (mode->clock > 600000)
If the clock has pass the linkrate and land_count limitation, the clock
would be OK because the linkrate and lane_count is trained. Why need to
check 600000?
Regards,
CK
> + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> +
> + return MODE_OK;
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists