lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list] 
Date:   Mon, 08 Aug 2022 05:21:16 -0700
From:   syzbot <syzbot+62120febbd1ee3c3c860@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To:     hdanton@...a.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in ext4_xattr_get

Hello,

syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer is still triggering an issue:
possible deadlock in ext4_setattr

loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 512
EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem without journal. Quota mode: none.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.19.0-rc4-next-20220628-syzkaller-dirty #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.0/4082 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880727814d8 (&ei->xattr_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: ext4_setattr+0x6ef/0x2c60 fs/ext4/inode.c:5378

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888072781810 (&ea_inode->i_rwsem#9/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:761 [inline]
ffff888072781810 (&ea_inode->i_rwsem#9/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: chown_common+0x364/0x710 fs/open.c:727

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&ea_inode->i_rwsem#9/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       down_write+0x90/0x150 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1542
       inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:761 [inline]
       ext4_xattr_inode_write fs/ext4/xattr.c:1392 [inline]
       ext4_xattr_inode_lookup_create fs/ext4/xattr.c:1530 [inline]
       ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x2ec5/0x3800 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1654
       ext4_xattr_ibody_set+0x78/0x2b0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2207
       ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x964/0x1500 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2364
       ext4_xattr_set+0x13a/0x340 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2477
       __vfs_setxattr+0x115/0x180 fs/xattr.c:182
       __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x125/0x5f0 fs/xattr.c:216
       __vfs_setxattr_locked+0x1cf/0x260 fs/xattr.c:277
       vfs_setxattr+0x13f/0x330 fs/xattr.c:303
       setxattr+0x146/0x160 fs/xattr.c:611
       path_setxattr+0x197/0x1c0 fs/xattr.c:630
       __do_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:646 [inline]
       __se_sys_setxattr fs/xattr.c:642 [inline]
       __x64_sys_setxattr+0xc0/0x160 fs/xattr.c:642
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

-> #0 (&ei->xattr_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2abe/0x5660 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5665 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5630
       down_read+0x98/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1489
       ext4_setattr+0x6ef/0x2c60 fs/ext4/inode.c:5378
       notify_change+0xcd0/0x1440 fs/attr.c:418
       chown_common+0x61b/0x710 fs/open.c:734
       do_fchownat+0x126/0x1e0 fs/open.c:765
       __do_sys_fchownat fs/open.c:780 [inline]
       __se_sys_fchownat fs/open.c:777 [inline]
       __x64_sys_fchownat+0xba/0x150 fs/open.c:777
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&ea_inode->i_rwsem#9/1);
                               lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
                               lock(&ea_inode->i_rwsem#9/1);
  lock(&ei->xattr_sem);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz-executor.0/4082:
 #0: ffff8880218da460 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_fchownat+0x101/0x1e0 fs/open.c:762
 #1: ffff888072781810 (&ea_inode->i_rwsem#9/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:761 [inline]
 #1: ffff888072781810 (&ea_inode->i_rwsem#9/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: chown_common+0x364/0x710 fs/open.c:727

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 4082 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc4-next-20220628-syzkaller-dirty #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/22/2022
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2abe/0x5660 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5665 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5630
 down_read+0x98/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1489
 ext4_setattr+0x6ef/0x2c60 fs/ext4/inode.c:5378
 notify_change+0xcd0/0x1440 fs/attr.c:418
 chown_common+0x61b/0x710 fs/open.c:734
 do_fchownat+0x126/0x1e0 fs/open.c:765
 __do_sys_fchownat fs/open.c:780 [inline]
 __se_sys_fchownat fs/open.c:777 [inline]
 __x64_sys_fchownat+0xba/0x150 fs/open.c:777
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
RIP: 0033:0x7fa069489209
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fa06a629168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000104
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fa06959bf60 RCX: 00007fa069489209
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000200000c0 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007fa0694e3161 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 000000000000ee01 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007fff974f8cff R14: 00007fa06a629300 R15: 0000000000022000
 </TASK>


Tested on:

commit:         cb71b93c Add linux-next specific files for 20220628
git tree:       https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1144f671080000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=badbc1adb2d582eb
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=62120febbd1ee3c3c860
compiler:       gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
patch:          https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=11e377b6080000

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ