linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] um: Improve panic notifiers consistency and ordering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f366b3d50aa8b713b0a921e4507bae4779a7cd02.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:08:28 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     pmladek@...e.com, bhe@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
        kernel@...ccoli.net, halves@...onical.com, fabiomirmar@...il.com,
        alejandro.j.jimenez@...cle.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        arnd@...db.de, bp@...en8.de, corbet@....net,
        d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        dyoung@...hat.com, feng.tang@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        mikelley@...rosoft.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com,
        jgross@...e.com, john.ogness@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org,
        luto@...nel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        senozhatsky@...omium.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
        tglx@...utronix.de, vgoyal@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
        will@...nel.org, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] um: Improve panic notifiers consistency and
 ordering

On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 16:03 -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 09/08/2022 15:09, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > V2:
> > > > - Kept the notifier header to avoid implicit usage - thanks
> > > > Johannes for the suggestion!
> > > > 
> > > >  arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c | 7 +++----
> > > >  arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c        | 8 ++++----
> > > >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > [...]
> > > 
> > > Hi Johannes, do you feel this one is good now, after your last review?
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > 
> > 
> > Yeah, no objections, my previous comment was just a minor almost style
> > issue anyway.
> > 
> > johannes
> 
> Perfect, thank you! Let me take the opportunity to ask you something I'm
> asking all the maintainers involved here - do you prefer taking the
> patch through your tree, or to get it landed with the whole series, at
> once, from some maintainer?
> 
Hm. I don't think we'd really care, but so far I was thinking - since
it's a series - it'd go through some appropriate tree all together. If
you think it should be applied separately, let us know.

johannes