[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvK5H+LVm3Bnb78+@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 20:44:31 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] add barriers to buffer_uptodate and
set_buffer_uptodate
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 02:32:13PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
>
> Let's have a look at this piece of code in __bread_slow:
> get_bh(bh);
> bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_read_sync;
> submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ, 0, bh);
> wait_on_buffer(bh);
> if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
> return bh;
> Neither wait_on_buffer nor buffer_uptodate contain any memory barrier.
> Consequently, if someone calls sb_bread and then reads the buffer data,
> the read of buffer data may be executed before wait_on_buffer(bh) on
> architectures with weak memory ordering and it may return invalid data.
>
> Fix this bug by adding a memory barrier to set_buffer_uptodate and an
> acquire barrier to buffer_uptodate (in a similar way as
> folio_test_uptodate and folio_mark_uptodate).
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/buffer_head.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/buffer_head.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/buffer_head.h
> @@ -117,7 +117,6 @@ static __always_inline int test_clear_bu
> * of the form "mark_buffer_foo()". These are higher-level functions which
> * do something in addition to setting a b_state bit.
> */
> -BUFFER_FNS(Uptodate, uptodate)
> BUFFER_FNS(Dirty, dirty)
> TAS_BUFFER_FNS(Dirty, dirty)
> BUFFER_FNS(Lock, locked)
> @@ -135,6 +134,30 @@ BUFFER_FNS(Meta, meta)
> BUFFER_FNS(Prio, prio)
> BUFFER_FNS(Defer_Completion, defer_completion)
>
> +static __always_inline void set_buffer_uptodate(struct buffer_head *bh)
> +{
> + /*
> + * make it consistent with folio_mark_uptodate
> + * pairs with smp_load_acquire in buffer_uptodate
> + */
> + smp_mb__before_atomic();
> + set_bit(BH_Uptodate, &bh->b_state);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void clear_buffer_uptodate(struct buffer_head *bh)
> +{
> + clear_bit(BH_Uptodate, &bh->b_state);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int buffer_uptodate(const struct buffer_head *bh)
> +{
> + /*
> + * make it consistent with folio_test_uptodate
> + * pairs with smp_mb__before_atomic in set_buffer_uptodate
> + */
> + return (smp_load_acquire(&bh->b_state) & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0;
> +}
> +
> #define bh_offset(bh) ((unsigned long)(bh)->b_data & ~PAGE_MASK)
>
> /* If we *know* page->private refers to buffer_heads */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists