[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220809060627.115847-1-gshan@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:06:25 +0800
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, maz@...nel.org,
oliver.upton@...ux.dev, andrew.jones@...ux.dev, seanjc@...gle.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, fweimer@...hat.com,
yihyu@...hat.com, shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] kvm/selftests: Two rseq_test fixes
There are two issues in current rseq_test implementation and the
series intends to fix them:
- From glibc-2.35, rseq information is registered by TLS. It means
rseq_test is unable to register its own rseq information. PATCH[01]
fixes the issue by reuse TLS's rseq information if needed.
- sched_getcpu() relies on glibc's implementation and it can simply
returns the CPU ID cached in the rseq information. In this case,
it's pointless to compare the return value from sched_getcpu()
and that fetched from rseq information. PATCH[02] fixes the issue
by replacing sched_getcpu() with getcpu().
Gavin Shan (2):
KVM: selftests: Make rseq compatible with glibc-2.35
KVM: selftests: Use getcpu() instead of sched_getcpu() in rseq_test
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists