linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-bys missing for commits in the vhost tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220809181520-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 18:22:38 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-bys missing for commits in the vhost tree

On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 08:01:39AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commits
> 
>   2d84b3963557 ("ack! tools/virtio: drop phys_addr_t typedef")
>   c6d14c52fba9 ("ack! tools/virtio: drop phys_addr_t typedef")
> 
> are missing Signed-off-bys from their author and committer.
> 
> Is this new set of commits really ready and destined for the current
> merge window?

Oh sorry.  They are empty, they just record that I need to add an ack to
the log of the previous commit. So harmless - I just forgot to squash
them - I would normally notice as I prepare the pull request.
Fixed - if you can pick up the new hash I just pushed pls do but
if not it's okay to test as is, too.

-- 
MST