linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] iio/hwmon/mfd/leds/net/power/ASoC: dt-bindings: few stale maintainers cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c6b890b6-e72f-0377-f0ae-cd15d29c23a1@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:25:29 +0300
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
        Robert Jones <rjones@...eworks.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Ricardo Rivera-Matos <r-rivera-matos@...com>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] iio/hwmon/mfd/leds/net/power/ASoC: dt-bindings: few
 stale maintainers cleanup

On 08/08/2022 21:52, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon,  8 Aug 2022 13:47:07 +0300 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Several of the bindings here had only one
>> maintainer and history does not always point to a new one (although I did not
>> perform extensive digging). I added subsystem maintainer, because dtschema
>> requires such entry. This is not the best choice as simply subsystem maintainer
>> might not have the actual device (or its datasheets or any interest in it).
>>
>> However dtschema requires a maintainer. Maybe we could add some
>> "orphaned" entry in such case?
> 
> Integrating it with MAINTAINERS would be another option worth exploring
> although slightly tangential.
> 
> How do you want this merged? It's all over the place subsystem-wise.

I was thinking this could go via Rob's tree as fixes for current cycle,
so your Ack would be great. If there is preference, I can split it per
subsystem, but for such trivial updates it's a bit of a churn.


Best regards,
Krzysztof