linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Make page tables for eager page splitting NUMA aware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YvLzDUjpJHmZtn0i@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 23:51:41 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Cc:     Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Make page tables for eager page splitting
 NUMA aware

On Tue, Aug 09, 2022, David Matlack wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 4:30 PM Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Approach B:
> > Ask page from the specific node on fault path with option to fallback
> > to the original cache and default task policy.
> >
> > This is what Sean's rough patch looks like.
> 
> This would definitely be a simpler approach but could increase the
> amount of time a vCPU thread holds the MMU lock when handling a fault,
> since KVM would start performing GFP_NOWAIT allocations under the
> lock. So my preference would be to try the cache approach first and
> see how complex it turns out to be.

Ya, as discussed off-list, I don't like my idea either :-)

The pfn and thus node information is available before mmu_lock is acquired, so I
don't see any reason to defer the allocation other than to reduce the memory
footprint, and that's a solvable problem one way or another.