lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 09 Aug 2022 08:35:14 +0200
From:   Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To:     Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, maz@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
        andrew.jones@...ux.dev, seanjc@...gle.com,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, yihyu@...hat.com,
        shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Use getcpu() instead of
 sched_getcpu() in rseq_test

* Gavin Shan:

> sched_getcpu() is glibc dependent and it can simply return the CPU
> ID from the registered rseq information, as Florian Weimer pointed.
> In this case, it's pointless to compare the return value from
> sched_getcpu() and that fetched from the registered rseq information.
>
> Fix the issue by replacing sched_getcpu() with getcpu(), as Florian
> suggested. The comments are modified accordingly.

Note that getcpu was added in glibc 2.29, so perhaps you need to perform
a direct system call?

Thanks,
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ