linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: exynos: Add SysMMU nodes for Exynos850

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <be2b90b5-a0f5-0e67-e032-bdde12c56fad@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 10:06:18 +0300
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        David Virag <virag.david003@...il.com>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: exynos: Add SysMMU nodes for Exynos850

On 08/08/2022 23:17, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> Add all SysMMU nodes to Exynos850 SoC device tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi
> index 8e78b50416d8..4204a443ea4a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi
> @@ -503,6 +503,51 @@ i2c_6: i2c@...90000 {
>  			status = "disabled";
>  		};
>  
> +		sysmmu_aud: sysmmu@...50000 {

Order the nodes by unit address at least within each other.

Best regards,
Krzysztof