| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB5880C5906E72063CB39CDBB0DA629@PH0PR11MB5880.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:14:57 +0000
From: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
To: "paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>
CC: "frederic@...nel.org" <frederic@...nel.org>,
"quic_neeraju@...cinc.com" <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
"rcu@...r.kernel.org" <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] rcu: Reduce the frequency of triggering irq-work for
strict grace period
On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 10:26:26AM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> For kernel built with PREEMPT_RCU=y and RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y,
> currently, the irq-work will be triggered by high frequency to make
> the scheduler re-evaluate and call hooks to check whether there are
> qs need to report when exit RCU read critical section in irq-disbaled
> context. however if there is no gp in progress, the irq-work trigger
> is meaningless.
>
> This commit reduced irq-work trigger frequency by check whether the
> current CPU is not experiencing qs or there is task that blocks
> the current grace period for RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y kernel.
>
> The test results are as follows:
>
> echo rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/function_profile_enabled
> insmod rcutorture.ko
> sleep 20
> rmmod rcutorture.ko
> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/function_profile_enabled
> echo > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
>
> head /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_stat/function*
>
> original:
>
> ==> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_stat/function0 <==
> Function Hit Time Avg s^2
> -------- --- ---- --- ---
> rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handle 838746 182650.3 us 0.217 us 0.004 us
>
> ==> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_stat/function1 <==
> Function Hit Time Avg s^2
> -------- --- ---- --- ---
> rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handle 841768 191138.6 us 0.227 us 0.024 us
>
> ==> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_stat/function2 <==
> Function Hit Time Avg s^2
> -------- --- ---- --- ---
> rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handle 828243 180455.6 us 0.217 us 0.004 us
>
> ==> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_stat/function3 <==
> Function Hit Time Avg s^2
> -------- --- ---- --- ---
> rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handle 810258 189158.1 us 0.233 us 0.023 us
>
> apply patch:
>
> ==> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_stat/function0 <==
> Function Hit Time Avg s^2
> -------- --- ---- --- ---
> rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handle 302373 67434.95 us 0.223 us 0.001 us
>
> ==> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_stat/function1 <==
> Function Hit Time Avg s^2
> -------- --- ---- --- ---
> rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handle 307174 68398.34 us 0.222 us 0.002 us
>
> ==> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_stat/function2 <==
> Function Hit Time Avg s^2
> -------- --- ---- --- ---
> rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handle 250910 56157.42 us 0.223 us 0.002 us
>
> ==> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_stat/function3 <==
> Function Hit Time Avg s^2
> -------- --- ---- --- ---
> rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handle 279902 62644.64 us 0.223 us 0.003 us
>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
>
>Looks good, queued for testing and review, thank you!
>
>Please check the version shown below for the usual wordsmithing.
Thank you for a more detailed description.
Thanks
Zqiang
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
commit 1e5aa3d5d53a6b38718510cce2b91a8199303891
Author: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
Date: Mon Aug 8 10:26:26 2022 +0800
rcu: Avoid triggering strict-GP irq-work when RCU is idle
Kernels built with PREEMPT_RCU=y and RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y trigger
irq-work from rcu_read_unlock(), and the resulting irq-work handler
invokes rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handle(). The point of this triggering
is to force grace periods to end quickly in order to give tools like KASAN
a better chance of detecting RCU usage bugs such as leaking RCU-protected
pointers out of an RCU read-side critical section.
However, this irq-work triggering is unconditional. This works, but
there is no point in doing this irq-work unless the current grace period
is waiting on the running CPU or task, which is not the common case.
After all, in the common case there are many rcu_read_unlock() calls
per CPU per grace period.
This commit therefore triggers the irq-work only when the current grace
period is waiting on the running CPU or task.
This change was tested as follows on a four-CPU system:
echo rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/function_profile_enabled
insmod rcutorture.ko
sleep 20
rmmod rcutorture.ko
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/function_profile_enabled
echo > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
This procedure produces results in this per-CPU set of files:
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_stat/function*
Sample output from one of these files is as follows:
Function Hit Time Avg s^2
-------- --- ---- --- ---
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handle 838746 182650.3 us 0.217 us 0.004 us
The baseline sum of the "Hit" values (the number of calls to this
function) was 3,319,015. With this commit, that sum was 1,140,359,
for a 2.9x reduction. The worst-case variance across the CPUs was less
than 25%, so this large effect size is statistically significant.
The raw data is available in the Link: URL.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220808022626.12825-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index b76076014e126..1514909cf905f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -641,7 +641,8 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
expboost = (t->rcu_blocked_node && READ_ONCE(t->rcu_blocked_node->exp_tasks)) ||
(rdp->grpmask & READ_ONCE(rnp->expmask)) ||
- IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD) ||
+ (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD) &&
+ ((rdp->grpmask & READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask)) || t->rcu_blocked_node)) ||
(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST) && irqs_were_disabled &&
t->rcu_blocked_node);
// Need to defer quiescent state until everything is enabled.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists