[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvIeLHuEb9XDSp6N@google.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 17:43:24 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
minchan@...nel.org, ngupta@...are.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
avromanov@...rdevices.ru, ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru
Subject: Re: ext2/zram issue [was: Linux 5.19]
On (22/08/09 10:12), Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > So currently, I blame:
> > commit e7be8d1dd983156bbdd22c0319b71119a8fbb697
> > Author: Alexey Romanov <avromanov@...rdevices.ru>
> > Date: Thu May 12 20:23:07 2022 -0700
> >
> > zram: remove double compression logic
> >
> >
> > /me needs to confirm.
>
> With that commit reverted, I see no more I/O errors, only oom-killer
> messages (which is OK IMO, provided I write 1G of urandom on a machine w/
> 800M of RAM):
Hmm... So handle allocation always succeeds in the slow path? (when we
try to allocate it second time)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists