linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/8] remoteproc: qcom: Add compatible name for SC7280 ADSP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 15:19:49 +0530
From:   Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
        <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        <broonie@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <quic_plai@...cinc.com>, <bgoswami@...cinc.com>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
        <tiwai@...e.com>, <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        <quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        <judyhsiao@...omium.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] remoteproc: qcom: Add compatible name for SC7280 ADSP


On 8/7/2022 2:27 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Thanks for Your Time Dimtry!!!
> On 03/08/2022 17:21, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
>> Update adsp pil data and compatible name for loading ADSP
>> binary on SC7280 based platforms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c 
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
>> index 2f3b9f5..bb4494c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
>> @@ -697,6 +697,24 @@ static const struct adsp_pil_data 
>> adsp_resource_init = {
>>       },
>>   };
>>   +static const struct adsp_pil_data adsp_sc7280_resource_init = {
>> +    .crash_reason_smem = 423,
>> +    .firmware_name = "adsp.mbn",
>> +    .load_state = "adsp",
>> +    .ssr_name = "lpass",
>> +    .sysmon_name = "adsp",
>> +    .ssctl_id = 0x14,
>> +    .is_wpss = false,
>> +    .auto_boot = true,
>> +    .clk_ids = (const char*[]) {
>> +        "gcc_cfg_noc_lpass", NULL
>
> The clock is not mentioned in dt bindings.
Will update in dt bindings and re post it.
>
>> +    },
>> +    .num_clks = 1,
>> +    .proxy_pd_names = (const char*[]) {
>> +        NULL
>> +    },
>
> Is the empty array necessary?
Okay. Will remove it.
>
>> +};
>> +
>>   static const struct adsp_pil_data cdsp_resource_init = {
>>       .crash_reason_smem = 601,
>>       .firmware_name = "cdsp.mdt",
>> @@ -737,6 +755,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id adsp_of_match[] = {
>>       { .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-cdsp-pil", .data = 
>> &cdsp_resource_init },
>>       { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-wpss-pil", .data = 
>> &wpss_resource_init },
>>       { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-adsp-pil", .data = 
>> &adsp_resource_init },
>> +    { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-adsp-pil", .data = 
>> &adsp_sc7280_resource_init },
>>       { },
>>   };
>>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, adsp_of_match);
>
>