[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220809104927.44366-1-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 18:49:27 +0800
From: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy: fix lock contention on mems_allowed
The mems_allowed field can be modified by other tasks, so it
isn't safe to access it with alloc_lock unlocked even in the
current process context.
Fixes: 78b132e9bae9 ("mm/mempolicy: remove or narrow the lock on current")
Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index d39b01fd52fe..ae422e44affb 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -855,12 +855,14 @@ static long do_set_mempolicy(unsigned short mode, unsigned short flags,
goto out;
}
+ task_lock(current);
ret = mpol_set_nodemask(new, nodes, scratch);
if (ret) {
+ task_unlock(current);
mpol_put(new);
goto out;
}
- task_lock(current);
+
old = current->mempolicy;
current->mempolicy = new;
if (new && new->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
@@ -1295,7 +1297,9 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
NODEMASK_SCRATCH(scratch);
if (scratch) {
mmap_write_lock(mm);
+ task_lock(current);
err = mpol_set_nodemask(new, nmask, scratch);
+ task_unlock(current);
if (err)
mmap_write_unlock(mm);
} else
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists