linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: exynos850: Add cmu and sysmmu nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:11:21 +0300
From:   Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        David Virag <virag.david003@...il.com>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: exynos850: Add cmu and sysmmu nodes

On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 10:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2022 23:17, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > Now that all clock domains needed for SysMMUs are implemented [1]
> > (pending), and the basic SysMMU v7 support is ready as well [2], let's
> > add all related CMU and SysMMU nodes to Exynos850 SoC device tree.
> >
> > All those SysMMU instances were tested with "emulated translation"
> > driver [4] on E850-96 board: both the emulated translation and fault
> > handling were verified.
> >
> > This patch series depends on [1], so it must be taken into the account
> > when merging it.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/8/8/752
>
> It should not be sent separately then, unless you are fine waiting
> entire cycle for this to land.
>

Sure, good point. If it's possible to take all those patches in a
single tree. I remember we already had a similar issue previously.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof