lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:57:31 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
        Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] KVM: x86/mmu: explicitly check nx_hugepage in
 disallowed_hugepage_adjust()

On 8/6/22 01:05, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>   	    !is_large_pte(spte)) {
> +		u64 page_mask;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Ensure nx_huge_page_disallowed is read after checking for a
> +		 * present shadow page.  A different vCPU may be concurrently
> +		 * installing the shadow page if mmu_lock is held for read.
> +		 * Pairs with the smp_wmb() in kvm_tdp_mmu_map().
> +		 */
> +		smp_rmb();
> +
> +		if (!spte_to_child_sp(spte)->nx_huge_page_disallowed)
> +			return;
> +

I wonder if the barrier shouldn't be simply in to_shadow_page(), i.e. 
always assume in the TDP MMU code that sp->xyz is read after the SPTE 
that points to that struct kvm_mmu_page.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ