linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: x86/xen: Stop Xen timer before changing IRQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43e258cc-71ac-bde4-d1f8-9eb9519928d3@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:59:12 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Coleman Dietsch <dietschc@....edu>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org, Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+e54f930ed78eb0f85281@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: x86/xen: Stop Xen timer before changing IRQ

On 8/9/22 11:22, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-08-08 at 14:06 -0500, Coleman Dietsch wrote:
>> Stop Xen timer (if it's running) prior to changing the IRQ vector and
>> potentially (re)starting the timer. Changing the IRQ vector while the
>> timer is still running can result in KVM injecting a garbage event, e.g.
>> vm_xen_inject_timer_irqs() could see a non-zero xen.timer_pending from
>> a previous timer but inject the new xen.timer_virq.
> 
> Hm, wasn't that already addressed in the first patch I saw, which just
> called kvm_xen_stop_timer() unconditionally before (possibly) setting
> it up again?

Which patch is that?

Paolo