linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: marvell: Update Armada 37xx platform bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YvJ2HKqMTTyWiNth@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:58:36 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: marvell: Update Armada 37xx platform
 bindings

On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 03:12:52PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> + Andrew, Gregory, Sebastian
> 
> please comment on this

Krzysztof said:

> The change is an ABI break, which looks reasonable, but still
> platform maintainer should comment on it. Especially on the aspect
> why the marvell,armada3710 fallback was chosen at the first place.

I was not involved in the armada37xx enablement. I have no idea why
marvell,armada3710 fallback was chosen.

Gregory might know, he is the author of this file.

It does however seem reasonable. And a grep does suggest this
compatible is purely cosmetic, it is not matched on anywhere.

	   Andrew