[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvKVRhzpoR2Mass2@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 19:11:34 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc:     Justin He <Justin.He@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, James Morse <James.Morse@....com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
        Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:EDAC-CORE" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 回复: [PATCH] ACPI: APEI:
 move edac_init ahead of ghes platform drv register
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 03:39:43PM +0000, Kani, Toshi wrote:
> I think this should be all edac drivers on x86.
Because?
> I was referring a hypothetical future case that ACPI GHES might not be
> the only FW interface for FF-based memory error reporting table going
> forward.
Don't tell me you have something else in the works which will override
GHES...
Can you guys make up your mind and stick with it?!
-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
