[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <30d8882efedea697da20c27563050008d1569b9e.1660068429.git.sander@svanheule.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 20:08:51 +0200
From: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/5] lib/test_cpumask: drop cpu_possible_mask full test
cpu_possible_mask is not necessarily completely filled. That means
running a check on cpumask_full() doesn't make sense, so drop the test.
Fixes: c41e8866c28c ("lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/346cb279-8e75-24b0-7d12-9803f2b41c73@riseup.net/
Reported-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>
Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
---
lib/test_cpumask.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_cpumask.c b/lib/test_cpumask.c
index a31a1622f1f6..4ebf9f5805f3 100644
--- a/lib/test_cpumask.c
+++ b/lib/test_cpumask.c
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static cpumask_t mask_all;
static void test_cpumask_weight(struct kunit *test)
{
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_empty(&mask_empty));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask));
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(&mask_all));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_weight(&mask_empty));
--
2.37.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists