[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a48d71d-41ee-bf39-80d2-0102f4fe9ccb@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 20:45:33 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/gup: fix FOLL_FORCE COW security issue and remove
FOLL_COW
On 09.08.22 20:27, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'm still reading through this, but
>
> STOP DOING THIS
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 12:32 AM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> + VM_BUG_ON(!is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags));
>
> Using BUG_ON() for debugging is simply not ok.
>
> And saying "but it's just a VM_BUG_ON()" does not change *anything*.
> At least Fedora enables that unconditionally for normal people, it is
> not some kind of "only VM people do this".
>
> Really. BUG_ON() IS NOT FOR DEBUGGING.
I totally agree with BUG_ON ... but if I get talked to in all-caps on a
Thursday evening and feel like I just touched the forbidden fruit, I
have to ask for details about VM_BUG_ON nowadays.
VM_BUG_ON is only active with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM. ... which indicated some
kind of debugging at least to me. I *know* that Fedora enables it and I
*know* that this will make Fedora crash.
I know why Fedora enables this debug option, but it somewhat destorys
the whole purpose of VM_BUG_ON kind of nowadays?
For this case, this condition will never trigger and I consider it much
more a hint to the reader that we can rest assured that this condition
holds. And on production systems, it will get optimized out.
Should we forbid any new usage of VM_BUG_ON just like we mostly do with
BUG_ON?
>
> Stop it. Now.
>
> If you have a condition that must not happen, you either write that
> condition into the code, or - if you are convinced it cannot happen -
> you make it a WARN_ON_ONCE() so that people can report it to you.
I can just turn that into a WARN_ON_ONCE() or even a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE().
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists