lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 19:08:43 -0600 From: Zan Aziz <zanaziz313@...il.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/21] 5.19.1-rc1 review On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 12:58 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.1 release. > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.1-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Hi Greg, Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7 No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg ./perf bench sched all # Running sched/messaging benchmark... # 20 sender and receiver processes per group # 10 groups == 400 processes run Total time: 0.865 [sec] # Running sched/pipe benchmark... # Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes Total time: 10.206 [sec] 10.206371 usecs/op 97978 ops/sec Tested-by: Zan Aziz <zanaziz313@...il.com> Thanks -Zan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists