linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm: add warning if __vm_enough

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1b8c3ece-c7bb-f11e-1f37-c2424d4ab57c@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:19:04 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: add warning if __vm_enough_memory fails


On 2022/8/10 10:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:32:46 +0800 Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi maintainer, any comments, thanks
> Looks great to me - I have it saved away.
>
> I prefer not to add new material during the merge window prior to MM
> being fully merged up.  In fact, I think this might be against
> Stephen's rules-for-linux-next.  Even during the merge window,
> linux-next remains the testing ground for Linus's "next" release,
> so adding next+1 material will weaken that testing.
Got it, thanks~
> .