| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <b723f2a292e92a792df95b912404e8d8e8e5e5f4.camel@svanheule.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 10:18:09 +0200
From: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] cpumask: UP optimisation fixes follow-up
On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 21:55 -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 07:36:32PM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > As an older version of the UP optimisation fixes was merged, not all
> > review feedback has been implemented. These patches implement the
> > feedback received on the merged version [1], and the respin [2], for
> > changes related to include/linux/cpumask.h and lib/cpumask.c.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1656777646.git.sander@svanheule.net/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1659077534.git.sander@svanheule.net/
> >
> > Sander Vanheule (3):
> > cpumask: align signatures of UP implementations
> > lib/cpumask: add inline cpumask_next_wrap() for UP
> > lib/cpumask: drop always-true preprocessor guard
>
> Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
>
> Applying at bitmap-for-next, after some testing.
Thanks! Any chance to get this in for 6.0? I would rather avoid building cpumask.o only on 6.0, but
otherwise I don't think anything is functionally wrong with what is currently merged.
Best,
Sander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists