linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/23] 5.10.136-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvLSEb8Or+vM+vSmopny7AAWsudzMTjeka-WdsLYSeEVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Aug 2022 13:55:08 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/23] 5.10.136-rc1 review

On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 23:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.136 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.136-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.10.136-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: cf6f87a93412e15617900d8213013eb3a6ca08ed
* git describe: v5.10.135-24-gcf6f87a93412
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.135-24-gcf6f87a93412

## No test Regressions (compared to v5.10.133-168-g4fd9cb57a3f5)

## No metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.133-168-g4fd9cb57a3f5)

## No test Fixes (compared to v5.10.133-168-g4fd9cb57a3f5)

## No metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.133-168-g4fd9cb57a3f5)

## Test result summary
total: 112413, pass: 99753, fail: 530, skip: 11427, xfail: 703

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 301 total, 301 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 62 total, 60 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 52 total, 50 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 51 total, 51 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 55 total, 53 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org