[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvOTEtEK5Urn+rvz@google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 12:14:26 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: fsl-imx25: Fix an error handling path in
mx25_tsadc_setup_irq()
On Sun, 31 Jul 2022, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> If devm_of_platform_populate() fails, some resources need to be
> released.
>
> Introduce a mx25_tsadc_unset_irq() function that undoes
> mx25_tsadc_setup_irq() and call it both from the new error handling path
> of the probe and in the remove function.
>
> Fixes: a55196eff6d6 ("mfd: fsl-imx25: Use devm_of_platform_populate()")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> mx25_tsadc_setup_irq() and mx25_tsadc_unset_irq() are not symetrical.
> One tests for "(irq <= 0)" while the other one tests for "(irq)".
>
> If <0 the probe will fails, so that is fine.
> If ==0, according to doc platform_get_irq() can't return 0, so that should
> be fine as well.
>
>
> That said, I think that the "if (irq)" in mx25_tsadc_unset_irq() can be
> removed.
> ---
> drivers/mfd/fsl-imx25-tsadc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists