[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220809185714.5af7057c1270b11079cb196a@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 18:57:14 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@...cinc.com>
Cc: <mhocko@...e.com>, <david@...hat.com>, <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
<sieberf@...zon.com>, <shakeelb@...gle.com>, <sjpark@...zon.de>,
<dhowells@...hat.com>, <willy@...radead.org>,
<quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mm: fix use-after free of page_ext after race with
memory-offline
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 20:16:43 +0530 Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@...cinc.com> wrote:
> The below is one path where race between page_ext and offline of the
> respective memory blocks will cause use-after-free on the access of
> page_ext structure.
Has this race ever been observed at runtime?
Given the size of the fix, I'm looking for excuses to not backport it
into -stable kernels!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists