[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d0c0cda2-9a79-35d7-39cf-aad8a12642d9@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 16:29:50 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"andrii@...nel.org" <andrii@...nel.org>,
"martin.lau@...ux.dev" <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
"song@...nel.org" <song@...nel.org>, "yhs@...com" <yhs@...com>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"kpsingh@...nel.org" <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
"sdf@...gle.com" <sdf@...gle.com>,
"haoluo@...gle.com" <haoluo@...gle.com>,
"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"paul@...l-moore.com" <paul@...l-moore.com>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"serge@...lyn.com" <serge@...lyn.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"keyrings@...r.kernel.org" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/10] bpf: Add bpf_lookup_*_key() and bpf_key_put()
kfuncs
[...]
>>> +noinline __weak struct bpf_key *bpf_lookup_user_key(u32 serial, u64 flags)
>>
>> Why the need for noinline and the __weak here and below? (If indeed needed
>> this
>> should probably be explained in the commit desc.)
>
> Oh, I took from v3 of KP's patch set. It is gone in v5. Will do
> the same as well.
>
>>> +{
>>> + key_ref_t key_ref;
>>> + struct bpf_key *bkey;
>>> +
>>> + /* Keep in sync with include/linux/key.h. */
>>> + if (flags > (KEY_LOOKUP_PARTIAL << 1) - 1)
>>
>> Can't we just simplify and test flags &
>> ~(KEY_LOOKUP_CREATE|KEY_LOOKUP_PARTIAL)?
>
> I thought as if we have many flags.
I'd keep it simple for now, and if the actual need comes this can still be changed.
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +
>>> + /* Permission check is deferred until actual kfunc using the key. */
>>> + key_ref = lookup_user_key(serial, flags, KEY_DEFER_PERM_CHECK);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(key_ref))
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +
>>> + bkey = kmalloc(sizeof(*bkey), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!bkey) {
>>> + key_put(key_ref_to_ptr(key_ref));
>>> + return bkey;
>>
>> nit: just return NULL probably cleaner
>
> Ok.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists