[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvPd8ewNOKdwMmR4@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 17:33:53 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5][RFT] ACPI: Drop parent field from struct
acpi_device
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> The parent field in struct acpi_device is, in fact, redundant,
> because the dev.parent field in it effectively points to the same
> object and it is used by the driver core.
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists