linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] sched/psi: per-cgroup PSI stats disable/re-enable interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YvPqcJh5Ffv4Yga9@slm.duckdns.org>
Date:   Wed, 10 Aug 2022 07:27:12 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>, corbet@....net,
        surenb@...gle.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] sched/psi: per-cgroup PSI stats
 disable/re-enable interface

Hello,

On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 11:25:07AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> How about just cgroup.pressure? Too ambiguous?
> 
> cgroup.pressure.enable sounds good to me too. Or, because it's
> default-enabled and that likely won't change, cgroup.pressure.disable.

.disable sounds more logical but I like .enable better for some reason. As
for just cgroup.pressure, yeah, maybe? The conundrum is that the prettiness
order is the exact reverse of the logical order. So, I'm okay with any of
the three.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun