[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0db39c6e-1147-ac53-15eb-f4009f4da4f5@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 12:27:34 -0700
From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
marcelo.cerri@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
khalid.elmously@...onical.com, philip.cox@...onical.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] x86/tdx: Add TDX Guest attestation interface
driver
On 8/10/22 12:09 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 08:44:15PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>> In TDX guest, attestation is used to verify the trustworthiness of a TD
>> to other entities before provisioning secrets to the TD.
>
> What is the difference between a TDX guest and a TD?
>
> I'm being told they're one and the same thing. If so, please rewrite
Yes. In this context, TD/TD guest means the same thing. So I will just
use TDX guest uniformly.
> this commit message into something actually readable because right now
> it is real hard to parse what this says.
>
> And pls avoid the Intel marketing bla - that's a write-only text and not
> meant for humans.
Ok. will do.
>
> Thx.
>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists