| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <HK0PR06MB3202089FA9C85DC92F24917180649@HK0PR06MB3202.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 03:31:41 +0000
From: Neal Liu <neal_liu@...eedtech.com>
To: liulongfang <liulongfang@...wei.com>,
Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Dhananjay Phadke <dhphadke@...rosoft.com>,
Johnny Huang <johnny_huang@...eedtech.com>
CC: "linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
BMC-SW <BMC-SW@...eedtech.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 1/5] crypto: aspeed: Add HACE hash driver
> On 2022/8/9 15:39, Neal Liu wrote:
> >>>> On 2022/7/26 19:34, Neal Liu wrote:
> >>>>> Hash and Crypto Engine (HACE) is designed to accelerate the
> >>>>> throughput of hash data digest, encryption, and decryption.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Basically, HACE can be divided into two independently engines
> >>>>> - Hash Engine and Crypto Engine. This patch aims to add HACE hash
> >>>>> engine driver for hash accelerator.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <neal_liu@...eedtech.com>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Johnny Huang <johnny_huang@...eedtech.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> >>>>> drivers/crypto/Kconfig | 1 +
> >>>>> drivers/crypto/Makefile | 1 +
> >>>>> drivers/crypto/aspeed/Kconfig | 32 +
> >>>>> drivers/crypto/aspeed/Makefile | 6 +
> >>>>> drivers/crypto/aspeed/aspeed-hace-hash.c | 1389
> >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>> drivers/crypto/aspeed/aspeed-hace.c | 213 ++++
> >>>>> drivers/crypto/aspeed/aspeed-hace.h | 186 +++
> >>>>> 8 files changed, 1835 insertions(+) create mode 100644
> >>>>> drivers/crypto/aspeed/Kconfig create mode 100644
> >>>>> drivers/crypto/aspeed/Makefile create mode 100644
> >>>>> drivers/crypto/aspeed/aspeed-hace-hash.c
> >>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/aspeed/aspeed-hace.c
> >>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/aspeed/aspeed-hace.h
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index
> >>>>> f55aea311af5..23a0215b7e42 100644
> >>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >>>>> @@ -3140,6 +3140,13 @@ S: Maintained
> >>>>> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/aspeed-video.txt
> >>>>> F: drivers/media/platform/aspeed/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +ASPEED CRYPTO DRIVER
> >>>>> +M: Neal Liu <neal_liu@...eedtech.com>
> >>>>> +L: linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> >>>>> +S: Maintained
> >>>>> +F:
> >>>>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/aspeed,ast2500-hace.yaml
> >>>>> +F: drivers/crypto/aspeed/
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> ASUS NOTEBOOKS AND EEEPC ACPI/WMI EXTRAS DRIVERS
> >>>>> M: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>
> >>>>> L: acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/Kconfig b/drivers/crypto/Kconfig index
> >>>>> ee99c02c84e8..b9f5ee126881 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/crypto/Kconfig
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/Kconfig
> >>>>> @@ -933,5 +933,6 @@ config CRYPTO_DEV_SA2UL
> >>>>> acceleration for cryptographic algorithms on these devices.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> source "drivers/crypto/keembay/Kconfig"
> >>>>> +source "drivers/crypto/aspeed/Kconfig"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> endif # CRYPTO_HW
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/Makefile b/drivers/crypto/Makefile
> >>>>> index f81703a86b98..116de173a66c 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/crypto/Makefile
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/Makefile
> >>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> >>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_ALLWINNER) += allwinner/
> >>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_ASPEED) += aspeed/
> >>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_ATMEL_AES) += atmel-aes.o
> >>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_ATMEL_SHA) += atmel-sha.o
> >>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_ATMEL_TDES) += atmel-tdes.o diff --git
> >>>>> a/drivers/crypto/aspeed/Kconfig b/drivers/crypto/aspeed/Kconfig
> >>>>> new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..059e627efef8
> >>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/aspeed/Kconfig
> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> >>>>> +config CRYPTO_DEV_ASPEED
> >>>>> + tristate "Support for Aspeed cryptographic engine driver"
> >>>>> + depends on ARCH_ASPEED
> >>>>> + help
> >>>>> + Hash and Crypto Engine (HACE) is designed to accelerate the
> >>>>> + throughput of hash data digest, encryption and decryption.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + Select y here to have support for the cryptographic driver
> >>>>> + available on Aspeed SoC.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +config CRYPTO_DEV_ASPEED_HACE_HASH
> >>>>> + bool "Enable Aspeed Hash & Crypto Engine (HACE) hash"
> >>>>> + depends on CRYPTO_DEV_ASPEED
> >>>>> + select CRYPTO_ENGINE
> >>>>> + select CRYPTO_SHA1
> >>>>> + select CRYPTO_SHA256
> >>>>> + select CRYPTO_SHA512
> >>>>> + select CRYPTO_HMAC
> >>>>> + help
> >>>>> + Select here to enable Aspeed Hash & Crypto Engine (HACE)
> >>>>> + hash driver.
> >>>>> + Supports multiple message digest standards, including
> >>>>> + SHA-1, SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512, and so on.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +config CRYPTO_DEV_ASPEED_HACE_HASH_DEBUG
> >>>>> + bool "Enable HACE hash debug messages"
> >>>>> + depends on CRYPTO_DEV_ASPEED_HACE_HASH
> >>>>> + help
> >>>>> + Print HACE hash debugging messages if you use this option
> >>>>> + to ask for those messages.
> >>>>> + Avoid enabling this option for production build to
> >>>>> + minimize driver timing.
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/aspeed/Makefile
> >>>> b/drivers/crypto/aspeed/Makefile
> >>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>> index 000000000000..8bc8d4fed5a9
> >>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/aspeed/Makefile
> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> >>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_ASPEED) += aspeed_crypto.o
> >>>>> +aspeed_crypto-objs := aspeed-hace.o \
> >>>>> + $(hace-hash-y)
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_ASPEED_HACE_HASH) +=
> >> aspeed-hace-hash.o
> >>>>> +hace-hash-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_ASPEED_HACE_HASH) :=
> >>>> aspeed-hace-hash.o
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/aspeed/aspeed-hace-hash.c
> >>>> b/drivers/crypto/aspeed/aspeed-hace-hash.c
> >>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>> index 000000000000..63a8ad694996
> >>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/aspeed/aspeed-hace-hash.c
> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1389 @@
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>>>> +static int aspeed_ahash_dma_prepare_sg(struct aspeed_hace_dev
> >>>> *hace_dev)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> + struct aspeed_engine_hash *hash_engine =
> >> &hace_dev->hash_engine;
> >>>>> + struct ahash_request *req = hash_engine->req;
> >>>>> + struct aspeed_sham_reqctx *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(req);
> >>>>> + struct aspeed_sg_list *src_list;
> >>>>> + struct scatterlist *s;
> >>>>> + int length, remain, sg_len, i;
> >>>>> + int rc = 0;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + remain = (rctx->total + rctx->bufcnt) % rctx->block_size;
> >>>>> + length = rctx->total + rctx->bufcnt - remain;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + AHASH_DBG(hace_dev, "%s:0x%x, %s:0x%x, %s:0x%x, %s:0x%x\n",
> >>>>> + "rctx total", rctx->total, "bufcnt", rctx->bufcnt,
> >>>>> + "length", length, "remain", remain);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + sg_len = dma_map_sg(hace_dev->dev, rctx->src_sg, rctx->src_nents,
> >>>>> + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >>>>> + if (!sg_len) {
> >>>>> + dev_warn(hace_dev->dev, "dma_map_sg() src error\n");
> >>>>> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> >>>>> + goto end;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + src_list = (struct aspeed_sg_list *)hash_engine->ahash_src_addr;
> >>>>> + rctx->digest_dma_addr = dma_map_single(hace_dev->dev,
> >> rctx->digest,
> >>>>> + SHA512_DIGEST_SIZE,
> >>>>> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> >>>>> + if (dma_mapping_error(hace_dev->dev, rctx->digest_dma_addr)) {
> >>>>> + dev_warn(hace_dev->dev, "dma_map() rctx digest error\n");
> >>>>> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> >>>>> + goto free_src_sg;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (rctx->bufcnt != 0) {
> >>>>> + rctx->buffer_dma_addr = dma_map_single(hace_dev->dev,
> >>>>> + rctx->buffer,
> >>>>> + rctx->block_size * 2,
> >>>>> + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >>>>> + if (dma_mapping_error(hace_dev->dev,
> >> rctx->buffer_dma_addr)) {
> >>>>> + dev_warn(hace_dev->dev, "dma_map() rctx buffer
> >> error\n");
> >>>>> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> >>>>> + goto free_rctx_digest;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + src_list[0].phy_addr = rctx->buffer_dma_addr;
> >>>>> + src_list[0].len = rctx->bufcnt;
> >>>>> + length -= src_list[0].len;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + /* Last sg list */
> >>>>> + if (length == 0)
> >>>>> + src_list[0].len |= HASH_SG_LAST_LIST;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + src_list[0].phy_addr = cpu_to_le32(src_list[0].phy_addr);
> >>>>> + src_list[0].len = cpu_to_le32(src_list[0].len);
> >>>>> + src_list++;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (length != 0) {
> >>>>> + for_each_sg(rctx->src_sg, s, sg_len, i) {
> >>>>> + src_list[i].phy_addr = sg_dma_address(s);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (length > sg_dma_len(s)) {
> >>>>> + src_list[i].len = sg_dma_len(s);
> >>>>> + length -= sg_dma_len(s);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + } else {
> >>>>> + /* Last sg list */
> >>>>> + src_list[i].len = length;
> >>>>> + src_list[i].len |= HASH_SG_LAST_LIST;
> >>>>> + length = 0;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + src_list[i].phy_addr = cpu_to_le32(src_list[i].phy_addr);
> >>>>> + src_list[i].len = cpu_to_le32(src_list[i].len);
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (length != 0) {
> >>>>> + rc = -EINVAL;
> >>>>> + goto free_rctx_buffer;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + rctx->offset = rctx->total - remain;
> >>>>> + hash_engine->src_length = rctx->total + rctx->bufcnt - remain;
> >>>>> + hash_engine->src_dma = hash_engine->ahash_src_dma_addr;
> >>>>> + hash_engine->digest_dma = rctx->digest_dma_addr;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + goto end;
> >>>> Exiting via "goto xx" is not recommended in normal code logic (this
> >>>> requires two jumps), exiting via "return 0" is more efficient.
> >>>> This code method has many times in your entire driver, it is
> >>>> recommended to modify it.
> >>>
> >>> If not exiting via "goto xx", how to release related resources
> >>> without any
> >> problem?
> >>> Is there any proper way to do this?
> >> maybe I didn't describe it clearly enough.
> >> "in normal code logic" means rc=0
> >> In this scenario (rc=0), "goto xx" is no longer required, it can be
> >> replaced with "return 0"
> >
> > Okay, I got your point. In this case, "goto end" is no longer required of course.
> > I would send next patch with this fixed included.
> >
> >>>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +free_rctx_buffer:
> >>>>> + if (rctx->bufcnt != 0)
> >>>>> + dma_unmap_single(hace_dev->dev, rctx->buffer_dma_addr,
> >>>>> + rctx->block_size * 2, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >>>>> +free_rctx_digest:
> >>>>> + dma_unmap_single(hace_dev->dev, rctx->digest_dma_addr,
> >>>>> + SHA512_DIGEST_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> >>>>> +free_src_sg:
> >>>>> + dma_unmap_sg(hace_dev->dev, rctx->src_sg, rctx->src_nents,
> >>>>> + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >>>>> +end:
> >>>>> + return rc;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +static int aspeed_ahash_complete(struct aspeed_hace_dev
> >>>>> +*hace_dev) {
> >>>>> + struct aspeed_engine_hash *hash_engine =
> >> &hace_dev->hash_engine;
> >>>>> + struct ahash_request *req = hash_engine->req;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + AHASH_DBG(hace_dev, "\n");
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + hash_engine->flags &= ~CRYPTO_FLAGS_BUSY;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + crypto_finalize_hash_request(hace_dev->crypt_engine_hash, req,
> >>>>> +0);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +/*
> >>>>> + * Copy digest to the corresponding request result.
> >>>>> + * This function will be called at final() stage.
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> +static int aspeed_ahash_transfer(struct aspeed_hace_dev
> >>>>> +*hace_dev) {
> >>>>> + struct aspeed_engine_hash *hash_engine =
> >> &hace_dev->hash_engine;
> >>>>> + struct ahash_request *req = hash_engine->req;
> >>>>> + struct aspeed_sham_reqctx *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(req);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + AHASH_DBG(hace_dev, "\n");
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + dma_unmap_single(hace_dev->dev, rctx->digest_dma_addr,
> >>>>> + SHA512_DIGEST_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + dma_unmap_single(hace_dev->dev, rctx->buffer_dma_addr,
> >>>>> + rctx->block_size * 2, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + memcpy(req->result, rctx->digest, rctx->digsize);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + return aspeed_ahash_complete(hace_dev); }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +/*
> >>>>> + * Trigger hardware engines to do the math.
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> +static int aspeed_hace_ahash_trigger(struct aspeed_hace_dev
> >> *hace_dev,
> >>>>> + aspeed_hace_fn_t resume) {
> >>>>> + struct aspeed_engine_hash *hash_engine =
> >> &hace_dev->hash_engine;
> >>>>> + struct ahash_request *req = hash_engine->req;
> >>>>> + struct aspeed_sham_reqctx *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(req);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + AHASH_DBG(hace_dev, "src_dma:0x%x, digest_dma:0x%x,
> >>>> length:0x%x\n",
> >>>>> + hash_engine->src_dma, hash_engine->digest_dma,
> >>>>> + hash_engine->src_length);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + rctx->cmd |= HASH_CMD_INT_ENABLE;
> >>>>> + hash_engine->resume = resume;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + ast_hace_write(hace_dev, hash_engine->src_dma,
> >>>> ASPEED_HACE_HASH_SRC);
> >>>>> + ast_hace_write(hace_dev, hash_engine->digest_dma,
> >>>>> + ASPEED_HACE_HASH_DIGEST_BUFF);
> >>>>> + ast_hace_write(hace_dev, hash_engine->digest_dma,
> >>>>> + ASPEED_HACE_HASH_KEY_BUFF);
> >>>>> + ast_hace_write(hace_dev, hash_engine->src_length,
> >>>>> + ASPEED_HACE_HASH_DATA_LEN);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + /* Memory barrier to ensure all data setup before engine starts */
> >>>>> + mb();
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + ast_hace_write(hace_dev, rctx->cmd, ASPEED_HACE_HASH_CMD);
> >>>> A hardware service sending requires 5 hardware commands to complete.
> >>>> In a multi-concurrency scenario, how to ensure the order of commands?
> >>>> (If two processes send hardware task at the same time, How to
> >>>> ensure that the hardware recognizes which task the current command
> >>>> belongs
> >>>> to?)
> >>>
> >>> Linux crypto engine would guarantee that only one request at each
> >>> time to
> >> be dequeued from engine queue to process.
> >>> And there has lock mechanism inside Linux crypto engine to prevent
> >>> the
> >> scenario you mentioned.
> >>> So only 1 aspeed_hace_ahash_trigger() hardware service would go
> >>> through
> >> at a time.
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>> .
> >>>
> >> You may not understand what I mean, the command flow in a normal
> scenario:
> >> request_A: Acmd1-->Acmd2-->Acmd3-->Acmd4-->Acmd5
> >> request_B: Bcmd1-->Bcmd2-->Bcmd3-->Bcmd4-->Bcmd5
> >> In a multi-process concurrent scenario, multiple crypto engines can
> >> be enabled, and each crypto engine sends a request. If multiple
> >> requests here enter
> >> aspeed_hace_ahash_trigger() at the same time, the command flow will
> >> be intertwined like this:
> >> request_A, request_B:
> >>
> Acmd1-->Bcmd1-->Acmd2-->Acmd3-->Bcmd2-->Acmd4-->Bcmd3-->Bcmd4-->A
> >> cmd5-->Bcmd5
> >>
> >> In this command flow, how does your hardware identify whether these
> >> commands belong to request_A or request_B?
> >> Thanks.
> >> Longfang.
> >
> > For my understanding, all requests will transfer into engine queue through
> crypto_transfer_hash_request_to_engine().
> > In your example, request_A & request_B would also enqueue into the engine
> queue, and pump out 1 request which might be FIFO to handle it.
> > crypto_pump_requests() will dequeue only 1 request at a time and to
> prepare_request() & do_one_request() if it's registered.
> > And aspeed_hace_ahash_trigger() is inside do_one_request(), so that means
> no other requests would come in during aspeed_hace_ahash_trigger() whole
> process.
> > The command flow intertwined
> >
> Acmd1-->Bcmd1-->Acmd2-->Acmd3-->Bcmd2-->Acmd4-->Bcmd3-->Bcmd4-->A
> cmd5-->Bcmd5 would not exist in any scenario.
> > Correct me if I'm misunderstanding, Thanks.
> >
> > .
> >
> At first，You need to understand the difference between threads and processes
> that I said.
> In a multi-threaded scenario, all threads will share the engine of a process,
> there will only be one engine queue to send cmds at the same time. However,
> in a multi-process scenario, each process will have its own engine queue, and
> when running at the same time, there will be multiple queues sending cmds.
>
> Then, I understand what you mean. Your driver uses the software queue of the
> encryption engine to ensure the cmds order.
> This method can ensure that the cmds of multiple threads in one process are
> sent in order.
> But you still need to consider the problem of multiple processes, when using
> your device for hash operations in multiple user processes, there will be
> multiple crypto engine software queues sending commands at the same time.
> Thanks
> Longfang.
I got your point. There is one important thing you need to know. This driver instance shares one driver data, and one crypto engine queue. All requests will enqueue into same engine queue, and dequeue it with its order even if multi-process scenario. So the confusion here is each process will "not" have its own engine queue but only 1 engine queue inside this driver data.
And it allows only 1 instance driver with Aspeed HACE device.
Thanks !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists