[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220811165408.23027-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:54:08 +0100
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
rafael@...nel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, lukasz.luba@....com
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: check only freq_table in __resolve_freq()
The there is no need to check if the cpufreq driver implements callback
cpufreq_driver::target_index. The logic in the __resolve_freq uses
the frequency table available in the policy. It doesn't matter if the
driver provides 'target_index' or 'target' callback. It just has to
populate the 'policy->freq_table'.
Thus, check only frequency table during the frequency resolving call.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 7820c4e74289..69b3d61852ac 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static unsigned int __resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
- if (!cpufreq_driver->target_index)
+ if (!policy->freq_table)
return target_freq;
idx = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, target_freq, relation);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists