[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a44b08c-ff30-3236-9e3e-775e4905561a@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 22:21:43 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
kan.liang@...el.com, acme@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
irogers@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/lbr: fix branch type encoding
On 8/11/2022 5:33 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
> In fact, I don't see a case where you would not benefit from the branch type.
> Furthermore, not having the branch type DOES NOT save any space in the
> branch record (given we have a reserved field). So I think I prefer not having
> to specify yet another cmdline option to get the branch type. In fact, if you do
> not pass the option, then perf report -D reports some bogus branch types, i.e.,
> not all entries have empty types.
Perhaps Peter remember the details, but there was some ABI compatibility
issue that motivated the extra save type bitmap.
Also there's another reason that if you don't need them and the hardware
doesn't support it they add run time overhead because the branches need
to be decoded in the PMI.
But I agree it would be useful to make them part of -b default, as long
as there is some way to turn it off again when not needed. The extra
option is kind of a pain.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists