[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220811210605.402337-3-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:05:58 -0400
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com, mlevitsk@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/9] KVM: x86: remove return value of kvm_vcpu_block
The return value of kvm_vcpu_block will be repurposed soon to return
the state of KVM_REQ_UNHALT. In preparation for that, get rid of the
current return value. It is only used by kvm_vcpu_halt to decide whether
the call resulted in a wait, but the same effect can be obtained with
a single round of polling.
No functional change intended, apart from practically indistinguishable
changes to the polling behavior.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 1c480b1821e1..e7bd48d15db8 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@ void kvm_sigset_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_sigset_deactivate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_vcpu_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-bool kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
bool kvm_vcpu_wake_up(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 515dfe9d3bcf..1f049c1d01b4 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -3429,10 +3429,9 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_check_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* pending. This is mostly used when halting a vCPU, but may also be used
* directly for other vCPU non-runnable states, e.g. x86's Wait-For-SIPI.
*/
-bool kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct rcuwait *wait = kvm_arch_vcpu_get_wait(vcpu);
- bool waited = false;
vcpu->stat.generic.blocking = 1;
@@ -3447,7 +3446,6 @@ bool kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (kvm_vcpu_check_block(vcpu) < 0)
break;
- waited = true;
schedule();
}
@@ -3457,8 +3455,6 @@ bool kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
preempt_enable();
vcpu->stat.generic.blocking = 0;
-
- return waited;
}
static inline void update_halt_poll_stats(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ktime_t start,
@@ -3493,35 +3489,32 @@ void kvm_vcpu_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
bool halt_poll_allowed = !kvm_arch_no_poll(vcpu);
bool do_halt_poll = halt_poll_allowed && vcpu->halt_poll_ns;
- ktime_t start, cur, poll_end;
+ ktime_t start, cur, poll_end, stop;
bool waited = false;
u64 halt_ns;
start = cur = poll_end = ktime_get();
- if (do_halt_poll) {
- ktime_t stop = ktime_add_ns(start, vcpu->halt_poll_ns);
+ stop = do_halt_poll ? start : ktime_add_ns(start, vcpu->halt_poll_ns);
- do {
- /*
- * This sets KVM_REQ_UNHALT if an interrupt
- * arrives.
- */
- if (kvm_vcpu_check_block(vcpu) < 0)
- goto out;
- cpu_relax();
- poll_end = cur = ktime_get();
- } while (kvm_vcpu_can_poll(cur, stop));
- }
+ do {
+ /*
+ * This sets KVM_REQ_UNHALT if an interrupt
+ * arrives.
+ */
+ if (kvm_vcpu_check_block(vcpu) < 0)
+ goto out;
+ cpu_relax();
+ poll_end = cur = ktime_get();
+ } while (kvm_vcpu_can_poll(cur, stop));
- waited = kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
+ waited = true;
+ kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
cur = ktime_get();
- if (waited) {
- vcpu->stat.generic.halt_wait_ns +=
- ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(poll_end);
- KVM_STATS_LOG_HIST_UPDATE(vcpu->stat.generic.halt_wait_hist,
- ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(poll_end));
- }
+ vcpu->stat.generic.halt_wait_ns +=
+ ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(poll_end);
+ KVM_STATS_LOG_HIST_UPDATE(vcpu->stat.generic.halt_wait_hist,
+ ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(poll_end));
out:
/* The total time the vCPU was "halted", including polling time. */
halt_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start);
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists