[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05cfb9dc-c740-5764-35f9-b5636e0577cb@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:04:01 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
suwan.kim027@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-blk: Avoid use-after-free on suspend/resume
On 8/10/22 10:09 AM, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
> +static inline struct virtio_blk_vq *get_virtio_blk_vq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +{
> + struct virtio_blk *vblk = hctx->queue->queuedata;
> + struct virtio_blk_vq *vq = &vblk->vqs[hctx->queue_num];
> +
> + return vq;
> +}
Would probably be cleaner as:
static struct virtio_blk_vq *get_virtio_blk_vq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
struct virtio_blk *vblk = hctx->queue->queuedata;
return &vblk->vqs[hctx->queue_num];
}
dropping the 'vq' variable, and also dropping the inline as the compiler
will work that out anyway.
Apart from that minor nit, looks good to me.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists