[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220811235222.inghj73tf6vudoyw@vaio>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 23:52:22 +0000
From: Daniel Müller <deso@...teo.net>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"andrii@...nel.org" <andrii@...nel.org>,
"martin.lau@...ux.dev" <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
"song@...nel.org" <song@...nel.org>, "yhs@...com" <yhs@...com>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"kpsingh@...nel.org" <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
"sdf@...gle.com" <sdf@...gle.com>,
"haoluo@...gle.com" <haoluo@...gle.com>,
"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"paul@...l-moore.com" <paul@...l-moore.com>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"serge@...lyn.com" <serge@...lyn.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"keyrings@...r.kernel.org" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/9] bpf: Add bpf_lookup_*_key() and bpf_key_put()
kfuncs
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:02:57PM +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > From: Roberto Sassu [mailto:roberto.sassu@...wei.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 9:47 AM
> > > From: Alexei Starovoitov [mailto:alexei.starovoitov@...il.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 11:34 PM
> > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 06:59:28PM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +static int __init bpf_key_sig_kfuncs_init(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
> > > > + &bpf_key_sig_kfunc_set);
> > > > + if (!ret)
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM,
> > > > + &bpf_key_sig_kfunc_set);
> > >
> > > Isn't this a watery water ?
> > > Don't you have a patch 1 ?
> > > What am I missing ?
> >
> > Uhm, yes. I had doubts too. That was what also KP did.
> >
> > It makes sense to register once, since we mapped LSM to
> > TRACING.
> >
> > Will resend only this patch. And I will figure out why CI failed.
>
> Adding in CC Daniel Müller, which worked on this.
>
> I think the issue is that some kernel options are set to =m.
> This causes the CI to miss all kernel modules, since they are
> not copied to the virtual machine that executes the tests.
>
> I'm testing this patch:
>
> https://github.com/robertosassu/libbpf-ci/commit/b665e001b58c4ddb792a2a68098ea5dc6936b15c
I commented on the pull request. Would it make sense to adjust the
kernel configuration in this repository instead? I am worried that
otherwise everybody may need a similar work around, depending on how
selftests are ultimately run.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists